Channel 4 – Picture This (after seeing programme 1)

I mentioned Picture This yesterday and have just watched the first programme. It suffered from the same things most modern TV programmes suffer from – assuming their viewers are idiots with no attention span. Reminding me after each break what happened a few minutes before. Having introductions every 10 minutes telling me what’s about to happen in the next 10 minutes and things like that. When you cut out all of that crap, you’re left with surprisingly little content. That’s true of a lot of TV though, so I can’t single this program out just for that!
What was left of the content was fairly interesting if a little frustrating. The first task was to produce a portrait shot that brought out the personality of the person being photographed. However, it didn’t look like that’s what the contestants had been told and it looked more likely that this brief had been fleshed out in editing afterwards – either that or they all ignored it which seems unlikely. The difficulty for us, the viewer, to decide if we thought the photographer had done a good job of this task or not was made near impossible because we’d barely heard any of them speak and knew nothing about them. We were lucky if we’d got 3 or 4 sentences out of them by that stage.
What we did get to see a lot of though were the three judges – especially that Martin Parr character. I think it would have been better if the judges had been a more varied bunch – all three of them are in the business of photography – it would have been nice to have a few that were just interested in the creative side.
The mentor, Joy Gregory did seem to talk more sense than the judges and seemed to be talking about the creative side of things rather than the money making potential of the images, so she was a breath of fresh air. Even so, we didn’t get that much out of her compared to the judges either.
All of the contestants produced some good images but the final decision about which two would have to leave seemed a bit strange to me. The most uncomfortable part of the program was watching the chap trying to stage his dancing children shot next to Brighton beach and earlier wandering around wondering what to do before finally finding a street cleaner to use as part of a photo. You can put a lot of that down to nerves and pressure but I would have imagined this contestant to be in the first batch to be dispatched.
After that it was a tough call.
I had prior knowledge of one of the contestants – Jay from the program, who is on Flickr as J L M. I find his Flickr stream of a very high quality and very stylish, so I was quite disappointed when he was voted off – however, his work raises it’s head above most things I see on Flickr. I think his portrait of the other contestant that the judges said she was too small in was my favourite of all of the portraits regardless of what the judges said.
Unfortunately, the Picture This web site seems to have been unavailable for most of the day, so I couldn’t use it to fact check the contestant and judge names above.
I’ll definitely watch the next two programs though to see how this pans out.
![Portrait with a Clumber horse [10/52]
I actually intended to try and do quite a straight portrait and include the horse at the side of me. I stood with my back to the horse with my camera at ... Portrait with a Clumber horse [10/52]
I actually intended to try and do quite a straight portrait and include the horse at the side of me. I stood with my back to the horse with my camera at ...](http://publicenergy.co.uk/Projects/52-Weeks/20100306-1145-0017-Edit/803460292_nQg6M-Th.jpg)




Roger B. 10:01 pm on January 6, 2008 Permalink |
Bugger… I forgot it was on.
Sounds like a fine example of “short attention span telly”.
publicenergy 10:11 pm on January 6, 2008 Permalink |
It’s repeated at 5AM on Tuesday!
It doesn’t seem to be available on the 4OD service unfortunately.
greywulf 10:14 pm on January 6, 2008 Permalink |
I agree with you all the way; I hate goldfish program making like this too.
I’d have like to see more about the “why” and “how” than the “who”. There way too much repetition, too much about the judges and not enough about the decision making processes involved. Mind you, considering that Martin Parr is one of the judges, what would make a “good” image would be entirely questionable anyhow :)
Shame, really. I hope the rough edges and weak attempts to be Dragon’s Den disappear over the next few episodes.
Nick P 11:08 pm on January 6, 2008 Permalink |
Nice article above that completely reflects my thoughts too.
I still can’t quite understand how their recruitment was obviously for AMATEUR photographers (and even billed as Britain’s Next Best Digital Photographer), yet suddenly on the show they expect them to be all professionals who are used to taking shots of stars and working in a studio.
As for Martin Parr… well my Mother always taught me that if you’ve nothing good to say then say nothing at all!
ELLIEPOTS 7:34 am on January 7, 2008 Permalink |
I was incensed that the contestant who staged his shot and manipulated it using photoshop should have been disqualified!!! Totally unethical and gives the name of photographer a bad name.
pauline 8:20 am on January 7, 2008 Permalink |
the comment that we’d hardly heard the photographers speak was very true. We were given very little about the backgrounds of the photographers and where they were coming from. Fromthe very quick snapshots of theier earlier work it would’ve been interesting to know more about them and what was behind their photographs. There were statements being made by the photographers that werent fully explained as not enough time!
brendadada 8:37 am on January 7, 2008 Permalink |
“that Martin Parr character”
Heh. I have reviewed my opinion of Parr this past year after looking at more of his work. He was bete noir of the profession back in the 70s and 80s, chopping off heads, making cruel portraits, all pretty ubiquitous devices now. I love his Ireland series’, especially the lone car in the rainy landscape photos. I met a friend of his this winter (did her house photos) which was a nice surprise: she knew exactly what she was talking about, photos-wise, which was really helpful to me.
Picture This seemed like yet another of the reality TV genre, and this assumption that just anyone can do it, particularly studio work, is a big stretch. There /must/ have been tuition: it would have been useful to see that. But it’s not telly for photographers, is it? They’ll have random celebs doing it next – Strictly Pictures. ;)
Does anyone else think that calling photographs ‘images’ is particularly telling?
Hitesh Sawlani 1:34 pm on January 7, 2008 Permalink |
It’s on the Channel 4 on demand service now… but you have to be in the UK to access it.
It’s also available in “other” online resources
dmt195 9:01 pm on January 13, 2008 Permalink |
Nice review. I thought the same really. I watched it using the 4OD service and without the ads all the ‘recapping’ is really obvious and annoying. Otherwise I found it fairly interesting.
I found myself thinking it was a little weird forcing these wildly different characters (creatively and technically speaking) into short timescale commercial ‘projects’. If each had a week to think of something and record their own video diary while they carried their ideas through it may have been a bit more interesting.
Channel 4 - Picture This (afte 9:38 pm on January 13, 2008 Permalink |
[...] enjoyed the second episode much better than the first one. Firstly, I decided to Tivo the programme and start watching 20 minutes after the start so that I [...]
Dan 8:47 pm on January 14, 2008 Permalink |
Interesting comments on Picture This. Low attention span telly it certainly was – in so many ways. Professional photographers are pretty sanguine about the competition from ‘amateur’ photographers these days but the real problem for our business and the industry in general is the erosion of the 1988 Copyright Act which states that the creator is the owner of the photographic image unless they sell on the copyright or licence the usage. PIctureThis was sponsored by Flickr who commonly allow content to be used free of charge by advertising clients with no legal obligation to reward the photographer or even publish a picture credit. In addition the Channel 4 “Picture This” website invites you to upload your work and again the term and conditions transfer all photograph usage to Channel 4 – in perpetuity.
That Martin Parr is involved, however inadvertently, in such a way is depressing as Magnum was founded to protect people from such exploitation in the first place. Almost every “public” competition is now run as an image grab exercise as imagery is a valuable resource.
A programme looking at the actual “business” of photography would be worth seeing but as the TV channels are involved in the exploitation it isn’t likely to happen!
Kind regards